|
|
|
|
|
7.4 Definition Suppose and a ,  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The asymptotic agreement between A and B (written: an(A, B)) is . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) The asymptotic agreement between a and b (written: aa( a , b ) is  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) The asymptotic disagreement between A and B (written: ad(A, B)) is 1 - aa(A, B). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) The asymptotic disagreement between a and b (written: ad( a , b )) is 1 - aa( a , b ). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that . So, ad( a , b ) is an asymptotic upper bound on the amount of disagreement of a and b on sufficiently large initial segments of N. The next proposition says that there is no finite function b , partial recursive a , and such that the "a-radius ball around a ," i.e., includes all recursive extensions of b . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 Proposition For each a , finite function b , and partial recursive a , there is a recursive f such that and ad( b , f) > a. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proof: Fix a, b , and a . Let If ad( a , f0 > a, we are done. Suppose . We construct from f0 an f as required. Let . Since , we have . Choose some . So, den(A) > b > 0. As A is r.e., we have, by Lemma 7.3, that there is a recursive with . Without loss of generality we assume . Let . By definitions of f and f0 and our assumption that , . Since B is recursive and , also. Observe that . Therefore, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, by Definition 7.4(d), ad( a , f) > a, as desired. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§7.3 Approximate Explanatory Identification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We now make use of the density notions of the previous section to develop a series of identification criteria based on approximations. (We follow the pattern of Chapter 6 by |
|
|
|
|