[Cover] [Contents] [Index] Previous page Next Section

Page 147
6-7 Motivated by the definition of Oex above, consider the following variation in the definition of scientists.
6.32 Definition Suppose 0147-001.gif.
(a) A scientist is a mapping from SEG to finite sets of programs.
(b) A scientist M is said to FOexa-identify f (written: 0147-002.gif) just in case there exists a nonempty finite set D such that the following hold:
1. for some 0147-003.gif,  j i=a f, and
2. for all but finitely many n, M(f[n]) = D.
(c) 0147-004.gif.
Show that Oexa = FOexa.
6-8 Let 0147-005.gif and 0147-006.gif. Show that, for all n, 0147-007.gif. (This generalizes the Nonunion Theorem (Theorem 4.25.))
6-9 Prove each of the following.
(a) Let 0147-008.gif. If M TxtBca-identifies L, then there exists 0147-009.gif such that the following hold:
1. 0147-010.gif;
2. WM( s ) =a L;
3. 0147-011.gif.
Such a  s  is called a TxtBca-locking sequence for M on L. (This is an analog of the locking sequence lemma (Theorem 3.22) for TxtBca-identification.)
(b) For 0147-012.gif, 0147-013.gif.
(c) 0147-014.gif.
(d) 0147-015.gif.
6-10 Consider the following variation on TxtBca-identification.

 
[Cover] [Contents] [Index] Previous page Next Section