|
|
|
|
|
6-7 Motivated by the definition of Oex above, consider the following variation in the definition of scientists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.32 Definition Suppose . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) A scientist is a mapping from SEG to finite sets of programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) A scientist M is said to FOexa-identify f (written: ) just in case there exists a nonempty finite set D such that the following hold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. for some , j i=a f, and
2. for all but finitely many n, M(f[n]) = D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-8 Let and . Show that, for all n, . (This generalizes the Nonunion Theorem (Theorem 4.25.)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-9 Prove each of the following. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Let . If M TxtBca-identifies L, then there exists such that the following hold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. ; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. WM( s ) =a L; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Such a s is called a TxtBca-locking sequence for M on L. (This is an analog of the locking sequence lemma (Theorem 3.22) for TxtBca-identification.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) For , . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-10 Consider the following variation on TxtBca-identification. |
|
|
|
|