[Cover] [Contents] [Index] Previous page Next Section

Page 146
1. 0146-001.gif;
2. WM( s ) =a L;
3. 0146-002.gif.
The sequence  s  is referred to as TxtExa-locking sequence for M on L. (This is an analog of Definition 3.24 for the TxtExa paradigm.)
(d) For all 0146-003.gif, 0146-004.gif. (Use the above locking sequence result.) Further conclude that 0146-005.gif.
6-4 (J. Steel cited in Case and Smith [35]) Show 0146-006.gif.
6-5 Consider the following definition.
6.30 Definition Let 0146-007.gif.
(a) M Exta-identifies f (written: 0146-008.gif) just in case 0146-009.gif 0146-010.gif.
(b) 0146-011.gif.
Show that Exta = Ext0 = Bc.
6-6 Consider the following criteria of success on functions.
6.31 Definition (Case and Smith [35]) Let 0146-012.gif.
(a) M Oexa-identifies f (written: 0146-013.gif) just in case there exists a nonempty finite set D such that the following hold:
1. for some 0146-014.gif,  j i =a f,
2. for all but finitely many n, 0146-015.gif, and
3. for each 0146-016.gif, there are infinitely many n such that M(f[n]) = i.
(b) 0146-017.gif.
Thus, M Oexa identifies a function f just in case M, fed the graph of f, vacillates among a nonempty finite set D of indexes such that there is at least one a-error index for f in the set D and each index in D is conjectured infinitely often by M. Show that for each 0146-018.gif we have that Oexm = Exm, but that 0146-019.gif.

 
[Cover] [Contents] [Index] Previous page Next Section