|Iterativity in Grammar
Deadline for Abstracts: October 15, 2019
Notification of Acceptance: November 1, 2019
Workshop: December 2+3 2019
Doreen Georgi (University of Potsdam)
Gereon Müller (Leipzig University)
Andrew Nevins (UCL, London)
Milan Rezac (CNRS-IKER, to be confirmed)
Rachel Walker (University of Southern California)
Call for Papers
Iterativity characterizes central phonological phenomena such as syllabification, stress assignment and vowel harmony, but is also crucial to major syntactic processes such as wh-movement (see e.g. Georgi 2017 and references cited there), and found in many morphological constructions (as in grand-grand-grand....mother). The motivation for this workshop is the observation that iterativity is a much more pervasive property of linguistic systems than is usually appreciated. Iterativity plays an important role in highly heterogeneous current debates, for example on the mechanics of syntactic Agree (Béjar & Rezac, 2009), and the evaluation of constraints in Agreement-by Correspondence approaches to phonological assimilation and dissimilation (Rose & Walker 2004, Bennett 2015). Importantly, recent theoretical developments also suggest that the classical notion of iterative rule application in phonology, which presupposes a built-in restriction to some form of strict structural locality is an epiphenomenon of more general mechanisms, either global constraint evaluation and independent constraints on structural coherence (Walker 2014), or a more general iterative optimization mechanism where locality restricts derivations and not structures as in Harmonic Serialism (Kimper 2012).
We invite abstracts on all aspects of grammatical iterativity, including, but not restricted to the following questions:
- How to resolve the tension between formal and descriptive iterativity?
We are especially interested in contributions on phenomena which are intuitively iterative, but might be better captured in a non-iterative way (as by parallel constraint evaluation, see e.g. Walker 2014), and conversely in iterative formalizations of data which are not prima-facie cases of iterativity (see Müller 2019 on affix order).
- Why are comparable processes iterative in one language/grammar, but non-iterative in another? Are there iterativity parameters (as for phonological rules in Archangeli & Pulleyblank 1994, or are iterative and non-iterative processes substantially different from each other (as has been claimed for vowel harmony vs. metaphony, see e.g. Kaplan 2008)?
- Processing and Computation: How is the iterativity of specific processes related to their complexity in human language processing and their computational complexity? (see e.g. McMullin & Chandlee 2018, Keine to appear)
- How does iterativity of single processes relate to more global grammatical iterativity? A case in point are grammatical formalisms where sets of procedures apply iteratively, as in Harmonic Serialism (McCarthy 2010, Müller 2019) or Stratal OT (Kiparsky 2015).
Abstracts should be maximally two pages, including data, references, and diagrams, in at least 11-point font, with one-inch (2,54 cm) margins. Submissions must be anonymous and are limited to 2 per author, at least one of which is co-authored. Only electronic submissions in pdf format will be accepted. Send your abstract via email to jtrommer [æt] uni-leipzig.de by October 15, 2019, 23:59 MET.
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (1994) Grounded Phonology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Bennett, W. (2015) The Phonology of Consonants: Harmony, Dissimilation and Correspondence. Cambridge University Press.
Béjar, S. & Rezac, M. (2009) Cyclic Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1):35-73.
Chen, M. (2004) Tone Sandhi Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1977) On Wh-Movement. In: P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.) Formal Syntax. New York, Academic Press.
Dresher, B. E. & Nevins, A. (2017) Conditions on Iterative Rounding Harmony in Oroqen. Transactions of the Philological Society 115(3):365-394.
Georgi, D. (2017) Patterns of Movement Reflexes as the Result of the Order of Merge and Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 48(4):585–626.
Gibson, E. & T. Warren. (2004). Reading-Time Evidence for Intermediate Linguistic Structure in Long-Distance Dependencies. Syntax 7:55–78.
Kaplan, A. F. (2008) Noniterativity is an Emergent Property of Grammar. PhD thesis, UC Santa Cruz.
Kimper, W. (2012) Harmony Is Myopic: Reply To Walker 2010. Linguistic Inquiry 43(2):301-309.
Kiparsky, P. (2015) Stratal OT: A Synopsis and FAQ’s. In: Yuchau E. Hsiao and Lian-Hee Wee (ed.) Capturing Phonological Shades. Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2-44.
Keine, Stefan (to appear): Locality Domains in Syntax: Evidence from Sentence Processing. Syntax.
McCarthy, J. (2010) An Introduction to Harmonic Serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(10):1001--1018.
Kushnir, Y. (2018) Lithuanian Pitch Accent. PhD thesis, Universität Leipzig.
Müller, G. (2019) Inflectional Morphology in Harmonic Serialism, Ms. Universität Leipzig.
Rose, S. & Walker, R. (2004) A Typology of Consonant Agreement as Correspondence. Language 80:475-531.
Smolensky, P. & Goldrick, M. (2016) Gradient Symbolic Representations in Grammar: The case of French Liaison. ROA 1286.
van Urk, C. & Richards N. (2015) Two Components of Long-Distance Extraction: Successive Cyclicity in Dinka. Linguistic Inquiry 46:113-155.
Vaux, B. (2008) Why the Phonological Component must be Serial and Rule-Based. In: B. Vaux & A. Nevins (eds.) Rules, Constraints and Phonological Phenomena. Oxford University Press, 20-61.
Walker, R. (2014) Nonlocal Trigger-Target Relations. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3):501-523.
Institut für Linguistik
jtrommer [æt] uni-leipzig.de
Jochen Trommers Homepage