|
|
|
|
|
5.21 Definition is called r.e. extendible just in case there is an r.e. index-able such that . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.22 Lemma TxtEx = [TxtEx]prudent if and only if every is r.e. extendible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.23 Lemma is r.e. extendible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§5.3 Constraints on the Use of Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each initial sequence T[n] of a text T provides partial information about the identity of content(T). The information embodied in T[n] may be factored into two components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) content(T[n]), that is, the subset of content(T) available to the scientist by the nth moment, and
(ii) the order in which content(T[n]) occurs in T[n]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human learners operate under processing constraints that prevent them from fully exploiting either kind of information. The notion of memory limitation studied in Chapters 3 and 4 is an example of a strategy modeling the first kind of restriction. The next two strategies capture the second kind of limitation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§5.3.1 Set-driven Scientists |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A set-driven scientist is insensitive to the order in which data are presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.24 Definition (Wexler and Culicover [194]) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) M is set driven just in case for all s , , if , then . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that we consider only the global version of set-drivenness. It is easy to verify that , the collection of finite languages, is identified by a set-driven scientist. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identification of a language L requires identification of every text for L, and these texts constitute every possible ordering of L. This consideration encourages the belief that the internal order of a finite sequence plays little role in identifiability. However, the next proposition shows the belief to be unjustified. |
|
|
|
|